Kindly read this story till end and then answer
my question at the end.
There were many thefts in a state which baffled
everyone. There was lot of political pressure on police to solve this trend. A
senior police officer did study of reported cases from various towns and came
to conclusion that 2 gypsy tribes which used to move around the country
together were involved in this crime. He conveyed this information to the concerned
minister. The minister then made a public statement about these findings. The
tribal chiefs rejected this as false claim. They wanted the minister to give
proof. So the minister arranged a meeting between the concerned police officer
and the tribal chiefs.
In the meeting the tribal chiefs told the
police officer that no one from their tribes was involved in such crimes. When
the police officer insisted they asked him for proof. The police officer then
informed that thefts had taken place in towns at times when their tribes were
camping near those towns though at little distance. The chiefs said that this
does not amount to proof. He then further stated that mostly young men from
their tribes were seen travelling by public transport to the concerned towns late
in evenings prior to night of thefts and travelling out early next mornings. He
further substantiated by telling that at times some articles like bead necklace
or headgear or other personnel clothing items used by tribesmen or empty
bottles of liquor brewed by these tribes were found at scenes of crime. The
chiefs told that this still does not prove without doubt that their men were
thieves.
On return to their tribes, they called all young
men for a joint meeting. They then advised them to ensure that they are not be
seen going to town in late evening, be careful of their belongings and not to
drink when they go for thefts to town.
Can you draw a parallel to this story in recent
times?